Archive for the ‘Bits and Pieces’ Category.

Follow Ons and Miscellanious

First up is an article in the NYT about President Obama being worried about being seen as politicizing intelligence if he released any of the information regarding the hacking by the Russians and their obvious slant toward Donald Trump.

The Obama administration spent months deliberating whether to blame Russia for a cyberattack on the Democratic National Committee, with action delayed in part because President Obama did not want to be blamed for politicizing intelligence, the White House said on Wednesday.

Do you think the Republicans would have hesitated?  In the end, it may have cost Hillary the election because you want to be fair to the boys and girls who are never fair?  Do you understand we are losing big time because we won’t play hardball.  This is not a game, it is our country and where is the leadership that understands that?  There may be interference by a foreign country and I am going to take the high road because…?  The Donald has already politicized the intelligence community so once again you are trying to prevent something that is already in play.

On the same subject, I am sadly appalled at the ho-hum attitude about Aleppo.  We are witnessing a genocide and we as a world community do nothing.  Our press keeps normalizing Trump will the butcher Putin is helping Assad murder thousands.  Again, President Obama, while show restraint that is well praised and well earned on many subjects, failed miserably here.  This is an example of where you have to lead from the heart.  Trying to find a solution to an almost impossible problem just left the administration flailing.

The no fly zone called for by many would have been a messy thing to try to achieve, but as I have argued before, and so did Hillary, it is the only humanitarian solution.  Apparently neither Europe or the United States has the moral courage to do the right thing here.  The shinning city on the hill is now a slum where all people care about is what new trinket they can afford.  Oh, and yes Americans would probably fight and die to establish it.  Can you think of a better reason than to stand for our very basic values and the dignity of life?

Meanwhile in North Carolina (oh why did we not let them secede?) the GOP legislature is moving to strip the new Democratic governor of his powers.  It would seem that those powers are fine if wielded by a Republican, but too much power (like selecting his cabinet posts) for a Democrat.  Yes, Virginia, Republicans are evil.

After calling a surprise special session, Republican lawmakers who control the General Assembly introduced measures to end the governor’s control over election boards, to require State Senate approval of the new governor’s cabinet members and to strip his power to appoint University of North Carolina trustees.

Meanwhile in economic La La Land, the Fed is raising the interest rate.  Watch things crash around June of next year and the Fed have to backtrack.  Just a reminder:  The Fed’s job is to ensure full employment and keep inflation at bay.  For you non-economics nerds, the theory is that at full employment is that pressure on wages as expanding businesses compete for employees rises, and this cause inflation across the board.  Some inflation is good and 2% is the state objective.  So you can see in a perfect world there is a balance between employment and inflation.  But let’s enter the real world.

The stated employment rate is 4.9% which is considered full employment, but where is the inflation?  In fact where is the increase in wages due to productivity increases? Also one might question the inflation rate of 2% when business are hanging on to their money.  Economic nerds think there is a “natural” interest rate and the current rate is way off that.  So there is the pressure to raise it.  But the reality is demand is meager, wages have not grown with increased profits, and the employment rate is probably not reflecting all those who left the job seeking market. The jobs created are not paying as well as they used to.

So I and others would argue that right now things are fragile and the Fed is managing according to their father’s economy, not the one we live in today.  I think things are going to go downhill with Trump and his conservative flow down ideas and the disruption in the world economy with both meddling by the Russians and illogical foreign policy by Trump and company.

So how is your day going?

The Lull, Medicaid/Medicare for All, and Free Speech

It’s the lull, that period between Christmas and New Year when news organization’s scramble for news so we get one of two genre of articles, the year in review, and real analysis.  The year in review drives a news junkie like my self batty.  I was there and I was awake.  We talked these things to death.  We need to be looking forward.  Now this is totally egocentric because most of the nation was not there or awake, and some of these stories might even wake them up, but I hate them.

The other one is real analysis, where reporters look at issues and really draw conclusions or at least logically evaluate them.  This is what should have been going on all year, but these stories get pushed off the page/screen for something outrageous that gets our attention but doesn’t really tell us very much.

In the spirit of the second case, analysis, I came across two stories that make me, and I would hope you, want to stop and think for a moment. The first was about the friction between Republican governors and Republican congress members on expanding Medicaid for members of their states. Here is a gem from one state governor:

“I know many South Dakotans are skeptical about expanding Medicaid, and I share some of those sentiments,” Mr. Daugaard said. “It bothers me that some people who can work will become more dependent on government.”

“But,” Mr. Daugaard said, “we also have to remember those who would benefit, such as the single mother of three who simply cannot work enough hours to exceed the poverty line for her family.”

Now there are two thing here to think about.  The first is that it bothers him “that some people who can work will become more dependent on government.”  It is the Republican mindset that government somehow hobbles you and turns you into a panting dog, waiting for your next treat.  We are all dependent of government.  That is the point of having government.  It solves problems we can’t individually.

I guess when you are living out there on that South Dakota prairie, government is just a hinderance until you fall off your horse and the nearest doctor is 500 miles away.  Then it becomes a life line.  Or what happens when that water from your well becomes contaminated because your neighbor is fracking?  Who comes to your aid during a severe weather event?  Who educates your kids or provides a university for them to go to? Oh, and that 3-day trip to get supplies becomes a couple of hour ride on that new highway because who invested in transportation?  But we don’t want to get too dependent on government do we?

The second part (the mother of three) is a tacit recognition that we are not all equal, that working hard is not the route to wealth for a lot of us, that life is not fair.  Some people need help.  And again, who provides that help?  That would be that stink’in gov’ment.  This violates the basic conservative idea that the playing field is level and if you work hard, you will succeed.  Therefore, if you are poor, you are lazy and just looking for a government hammock.  Oh my, no wonder conservatives in Congress who can deny reality so well are all up in arms.

The other article was about maybe how we ought to rethink our definition of free speech since ISIS seems to be so successful at recruiting through the Internet, and maybe this is a classic example of shouting fire in a crowded theater and should be censored.  Oh my.  We have heard calls to censor the Internet (the Donald) of ISIS propaganda and there is even serious talks among some scholars about maybe revisiting the definition of free speech in the digital age.  Again, oh my.  Think this through people.

From a legal point of view we have the standard now that speech cannot be censored unless it incites imminent lawless action. Screaming fire in the crowded theater is certainly that.  But what of religious propaganda?  If ISIS can be censored for their ideas, what of Christian abortion protestors?  Which speech do you dislike more?  And that is the crux of the issue.  It is only a simple change of perspective to then see another point of view than yours as imminently threatening.  Would “Give me liberty or give me death” be censored from the English point of view?   It is almost funny that the Donald wants this censorship while he rails against political correctness.  If this kind of censorship were allowed, would we not censor the Donald?

In my mind there is a whole other standard and revolves around imminently.  Does ISIS propaganda make me grab a rifle and go out and shoot someone?  No. It affects a very few people on the margins and it takes a while to work its affect.  There is plenty of time to counter it with alternate propaganda but we really haven’t tried.  So it is a major failure of the “Fire!” test.  Most of us will hear it and write it off as nonsense where as in the fire test, we all are heading for the exits.  It is just a question of whose crazy and dangerous point of view.  Now we get into real trouble when we try to decide who the crazy ones are because by definition, that is anyone who disagrees with us.

I will leave you with this from the article where the legal professionals were discussing what are the limits of free speech which makes my point about from whose perspective:

Geoffrey R. Stone, an expert on constitutional law at the University of Chicago, said in an interview that Mr. Posner and Mr. Sunstein “have been provocative, which is what academics do.”

“But I think they are wrong,” he added.

“We’ve learned over 200 years of history that what seems like a sensible approach in the heat of the moment, in terms of restricting speech, is highly likely to be a bad judgment, Mr. Stone said.

The Sedition Act of 1798, he noted, which outlawed false statements about the government, was used by the Federalists to persecute their opponents, the supporters of Thomas Jefferson.

Bits and Pieces

Just little odds and ends on a Friday that popped into my head listening to the news before going out in the Vineyard to work:

Nigeria – It was noted that the name of the terrorist group that abducted the 297 teenage girls translates into “Western education is sin.” It was noted that many extremist groups oppose education. I wonder if they included the Republican Party that wants to cut funding for education, hates the common core*, and is trying to cut funding for research and development? Oh and did I mention their assault on science?

Stupidity and a Southern Accent – She who must never be mentioned here (and a good friend from Tennessee) often berate me when I either use a southern accent or write derogatively about the South when depicting ignorance. And of course I know many brilliant people from the South. But when you turn on the TV and some moron is spouting about Obamacare failing, global warming doesn’t exist, Benghazi and the IRS are Obama plots, or why women shouldn’t be paid the same as men, it always comes from someone with a Southern accent. I would think Southerners would want to do something about that.

Intellectualism Republican Style – Last week according to Jonathan Chait, Charles Krauthammer and George Will were on a “Fox All Star Panel” and they were discussing how the latest findings by American scientists on global warming is all wrong. Now here is the really sad thing. If these are truly Republican intellectuals, their dogma no longer allows them to think. Or as Jonathan put it:

To watch Will and Krauthammer grasp for rationales to cast doubt on an established scientific field merely because its findings pose a challenge to their ideological priors is a depressing, and even harrowing, study in the poisonous effects of dogma upon a once-healthy brain. They have amassed an impressive array of sound bites and factoids, and can render them with convincing gravitas, and yet their underlying reasoning is absolutely bonkers.

You have to wonder what else they are blind to because of their dogma. David Brooks is another one that falls into this trap.

Obama on Energy at Walmart – President Obama was at Walmart today lauding the company for their strides in energy efficiency. Some have suggested that a better topic if you are going to Walmart would be economic inequality. But then he told the crowd that housing is recovering. Once again he is listening to elites. According to a great report on housing by Peter Dreier (What Housing Recovery):

More than 10 million Americans, spread across 23 states, live in ZIP codes where between 43 percent and 76 percent of homeowners are under water. The biggest concentrations are in Georgia, Florida, Illinois, Michigan and Ohio. The cities in the worst shape are Las Vegas, Atlanta, Jacksonville, Orlando and Chicago. Places with so many underwater homes are toxic; they depress the value of surrounding homes and undermine local governments’ fiscal health.

Just another example where things are getting better for the 1% and in cities where people can afford to move into gentrified neighborhoods, but the rest of us are ignored and President Obama is listening to those fresh water economists who get their funding from the .1%. No we don’t have no stinking oligarchy.

Egan on the Kochs – Probably the best thing I read today was Timothy Egan on the Koch brothers trying to hold back the march of time by denying global warming. But here are some of my favorite quotes about the Koch brothers and the Tea Party:

They have used a big part of this fortune to attack the indisputable science on climate change, to buy junk scholars, to promote harmful legislation at the state level, to go after clean, renewable energy like solar, and to try to kill the greatest expansion of health care in decades. Money can’t buy love, but it certainly can cause a lot of havoc.

According to one study, the Kochs have already spent $61 million on various front groups dedicated to the flat-earth proposition that the globe is not warming. But so far, the only return on that investment is a cohort of people flopping around in the waters of stupidity … About 44 percent of Republicans and 70 percent of Tea Party-leaning voters believe there is no solid evidence that the earth is getting warmer, according to the Pew Research Center. …

Well just another Friday where the big news is whether the Democrats will participate in the Benghazi hearings. Didn’t John Boehner ask, Where are the jobs?

*The common core is a wonderful idea, but its implementation is faulty, failing to prepare teachers and too much testing too soon. But having a standard set for what our kids should learn and focusing on more critical thinking may be antithetical to the Tea Party because then people could actually see through their nonsense.

Bits and Pieces

I see where two past Popes (John XXIII & John Paul III) are to be canonized. No not fired out of a canon, but made saints. Get the old jersey number painted on the stadium wall so to speak. I am surprised Ronald Reagan wasn’t also considered. I wonder if it kind of waters down sainthood when too many get the nod when most of us know the miracle thing is wishful thinking. I wonder where I can get a John XXIII jersey? Could it be worn at Easter Mass?

In the world of inequality I see where Walmart Owners (Waltons) are giving millions to charter schools. Isn’t that wonderful that they are trying to help kids? Or is it horrible that they are trying to undermine public schools since public schools have to subsidize charter schools and charter schools can scoop the cream off the top? Oh, and they don’t have to follow the rules public schools have to. How long before you see the Walton’s right leaning ideas influencing curriculum of schools they paid for? Where do you think this is all going?

As a project manager, I am just intrigued by Oregon’s failed Obamacare website. Here is a state that is bluer than blue, with a great tech company, Oracle, as their prime contractor, and they never got the thing to work. What is falling out is that the state took on the role of program integrator (to coordinate all the activities of the various players and required interfaces) and it is one of the only states to not hire professionals to do this. Then when problems were identified they were quashed by this state agency as being alarmist. At least that is what is coming out before the major investigations start. I think this is going to one of those great examples of how to ignore project management 101. Let the lawsuits begin.

As a final shot across your weekend bow, let me show you how fiction is more real that reality. I am a great fan of the British World War II mystery drama on PBS, Foyle’s War. Foyle is a civilian detective in wartime England. One of the stories (War Games) describe how a murder was an attempt to cover up wartime business dealings that went on with the Nazis even when they were at war with them. As one of the anti-heros spouts, “Wars will come and go, but business always goes on.” Well here is from the NYT this morning:

Russia and its allies in the European private sector are conducting a separate campaign to ensure that they can maintain their deep and longstanding economic ties even if the Kremlin orders further military action.

Making money and maximizing shareholder profits is way more important than enslaving people of Eastern Europe, right?

Enjoy your weekend.

Bits and Pieces

There is an interesting piece about how Putin used sophisticated thuggery to take Crimea,

For its intervention in Crimea, the Russians used a so-called snap military exercise to distract attention and hide their preparations. Then specially trained troops, without identifying patches, moved quickly to secure key installations. Once the operation was underway, the Russian force cut telephone cables, jammed communications and used cyberwarfare to cut off the Ukrainian military forces on the peninsula.

What ought to worry the Crimean people is that this same sophistication will be employed to govern and control them. Be careful what you wish for.

I find it interesting how quickly Thomas Piketty’s book and the Gilens and Page study has hit the mainstream media (with the usual deniers from the conservative side). For my part, I think they hit on something we already knew at some basic level and this just brought it out into the open. Now the question is what do we do about it? From my vantage point, voting out conservatives is the first step because they represent no change, desperately hanging on to the status quo. Then we have to watch Democrats very closely.

In kind of an confirmation of these studies, you wonder how President Obama could pivot from the economy and jobs to debt, maintain the level of secrecy that is antithetical to democracy (drones, torture, surveillance), missed the mark on stimulus, and not really reformed the financial sector. The answer is that economic elites surround him and that is the echo chamber he lives in.

Being a user of Airbnb, HomeAway, and other sites that advertise rentals directly between property owners and people needing a place to stay on a vacation, I was intrigued to read that “regulators as well as some elected officials across the country are increasingly questioning the presumptions and tactics of these start-ups, especially the notion that laws do not apply to them.” For example in NYC, it is against the law to rent a place for less than 30 days and it is estimated that 60% of the rentals on these sites are violating this rule.

I guess my thought here is that we are living in a new sharing economy where this is both a way to find an affordable place to stay and be able to afford the property you own. Welcome to economic inequality and one of its affects. One home owner that rents out part of her home put it this way:

“Kimberly is an Airbnb host on the Lower East Side,” the memo says. “She has a chronic illness that prevents her from working.” Kimberly is quoted directly: “My husband and I spent countless nights wondering if and when we would lose our home, or if we would have to stop treatment to keep a roof over our heads.” She concludes, “Airbnb saved us.”

My thought would be that the economy is changing for many of us and the old rules can’t just be applied without killing the new way of doing things. Maybe there is a need for control in terms of safety, but I have not seen it. Maybe hotels are pressuring the regulatory agencies because of the competition. I think what we are seeing are businesses being created out of the necessity of the new economy. It would be patently stupid to apply old economy rules to innovation and change without thinking very carefully about what we are doing and not just protecting vested interests.

So Many Things and Yet Nothing Ever Changes

Where to start? Apparently President Obama has yet to seize the initiative on appointing justices after the reform of the filibuster and the people most upset about his appointments are Democrats. This is probably another example of the center has moved so far to the right that President Obama thinks he is being moderate when he is actually playing the Republican’s game (NYT). It is also another example of how out of touch with reality people who live within the Beltway are.

Thailand continues to amaze me and should worry everyone (NYT). The haves are upset with the have-nots because they control the polls and are preventing elections to prevent an outcome they can’t live with. Oh those crazy Asians. But then if you step back and think about Republicans, terrified of losing their fat white man edge, they are doing exactly the same thing in trying to disenfranchise voters through voter ID laws and limiting access to the polls. To a lot of people (those that got theirs and don’t want to share) democracy and the will of the majority of people is a very scary thing.

The Republicans have actually released a plan to revise the tax code that according to many knowledgable pundits, is workable, with fixes (Dean Baker). So I tried to work my way through it and what I found was that it was a simplification, but it is still tinkering with our overly complex income based tax system (and the amazing accounting system required to track all our income). What I can’t understand is why we are trying to fix a broken system and not just throw it away in favor of a system that taxes consumption like most other countries with a simple income tax to adjust for disparities (the poor spend more of their income than the rich so their tax rate would be unfair).

Meanwhile in irrational land (Idaho) apparently the state legislature is about to pass a bill to allow students to carry weapons. Now one could launch on the insaneness of this, but thanks to Greg Hampikian, a professor of biology and criminal justice at Boise State University, it was all said in one of the funniest ironic pieces I have ever read: When May I Shoot a Student? I guess there are two points here. One about the inane stupidity of more guns somehow making us safer, and the other, that humor best demonstrates our follies.

One last thing from the Roosevelt Institute, with the deficit coming down, will the economy go with it? The conservatives have sold us the policy that the deficit is causing all our economic problems, yet the usual suspects, high interest rates and inflation haven’t happened. So the confidence fairy was invented that said that businesses simply won’t expand because they lack confidence in the economy. This is a supply argument. If businesses make more things, people will buy them. It also is lacking any data to support it. When businesses are surveyed (as opposed to anecdotal conversations) they report that demand is weak. Simply stated, people don’t have expendable income to buy things.

But we got sold on the austerity thing and it is holding us back. And while the deficit is coming down, there are no jobs. Many of us argue that the real way out of the deficit is growth, not austerity. With an expanding economy, tax revenues increase and as a percent of GDP, the deficit becomes less. That is how we reduced our debt after WWII. Will anyone listen? I doubt it. The Beltway is stuck in 1990’s groupthink and that includes our present administration. On the other hand, we have tried austerity and it didn’t work, why don’t we try investing in our future? Oh, I forgot. Republicans and an overly timid President.

Thursday Morning

I am wondering if Jan Brewer did the “right ” thing by vetoing the gay discrimination bill that could have been used to discriminate against anyone. By right, I mean did she recognize that the bill was fundamentally against everything we Americans stand for in the name of religious freedom, or was she and the Chamber of Commerce just afraid they would lose business, and it really is all about the money? They will just wait for another day when we aren’t looking.

The other day I got a great email (The Baseline Scenario from James Kwak on savings. Apparently, several think tanks supported by financial institutions are trying to get Americans to save more (so they can use your money to make money). And as James points out, savings isn’t bad, but we fail to recognize reality:

I’m all for living within your means and saving for retirement and all that. But it’s a myth to say, as America Saves does on its home page, “Once you start saving, it gets easier and easier and before you know it, you’re on your way to making your dreams a reality.” The underlying problems are stagnant real incomes for most people, rising costs (in real terms) for education and health care, increasing financial risk due to the withdrawal of the safety net, and increased longevity (good in some ways, but bad if incomes aren’t rising and you want to retire at 65). That’s why households are showing up at age 64 with less in retirement savings than they had just last decade. And why, if you feel like you’re not saving enough, it’s probably not your fault.

It is also why increasing social security is so important because the other two legs of the retirement stool, savings and pensions, are going away. Sooner or later you would think people could connect the dots on why good paying jobs are so important instead of rushing to the bottom like in Tennessee.

Paul Krugman made a really good point about why we have all this data to show us what we ought to be doing and why it is useless on the echo chamber that is Washington utilizing an article by Dan Drezner in Politico:

One of the Beltway tribe’s greatest strengths is also one of its greatest weaknesses: groupthink. As I noted before, a Beltway consensus actually counts for something in the world of international policymaking. That does not mean that this consensus emerges from any solid analysis, however. For example, a hidden cause of the enthusiasm for austerity in Washington that crested in 2010 was the consensus among foreign policy pundits that U.S. debt was spiraling out of control, rendering Washington vulnerable to foreign holders of U.S. Treasuries. This groupthink formed at the same time that the budget deficit as a percentage of output was shrinking at the fastest rate in American history. By the time the consensus had emerged, however, the change in the facts didn’t matter. Since the principal activity of Beltway folk is to talk to each other, the result is a feedback loop of confirmation bias that eventually leads to epistemic closure.

And that also explains why everyone where I live is conservative and believes in nonsense. The don’t read and spend their lives talking to others will the same nonsense masquerading as facts.

Finally, there is an article in the NYT that says that a survey shows that even with the rift in the Republican Party, they have the edge in 2014 among independents. I wonder who they are surveying and if the world is changing so fast, that the movement away from the failed ideas of the Republican Party has not been sensed by the Beltway media. James Blow, in an editorial, makes the case that millennials (those ages 18 to 33) are totally turned off by the latest anti-gay bashing of the Republican Party and that may speak to a shift in political loyalty. All I can say is I hope so. But they still have to vote and real question is will they.

SNAP Cuts and Another Alternate Reality

As Paul Krugman pointed out today, the Republicans are waging a war on the poor which does not comport with reality. This is evidenced by their attack on food stamps.  While they happily continue subsidies to rich farmers, the poor don’t deserve help.  The House bill for food stamps has the following Dickens Poor House characteristics:

  • Cuts SNAP by $39 billion over 10 years
  • Drops 3.8 million from rolls in 2014
  • Adds work requirments
  • Requires drug testing

Here are a few of the Republican statements about the SNAP program (food stamps)  from a recent hearing:

Representative Steve King (R-Iowa):  I will continue to work with my colleagues to implement reform in the SNAP program to cut back on waste fraud and abuse.

Rep Rand Neugegauer (R-Texas):  Why does the safety net need reforming, because people are getting tangled up in stuck in it. The House addresses this by ending benefits for people who quite honestly don’t qualify for them.

Rep Martha Roby (R-Alabama): But the program exists to lift up those who have hit bottom, not keep them there.

Rep Mike Conaway (R-Texas): Asking people to work in return for food stamp programs is not any form of cruelty or unusual punishment. The dignity of work has long been a pretty common theme throughout the ages.

Rep Steve Southerland (R-Florida): Cutting food stamp program is insuring that the truly vulnerable families receive the support they need in more efficient and effective manner.

So here is the summary: There is tons of fraud waste and abuse, and food stamps just provide a crutch so that the lazy do not have to work. People who are rich (gentlemen farmers) obviously work hard and should get government handouts. Oh, and clearly food stamp recipients are all drug addicts. This is all nonsense and if these people could use the internet or their brain cells, they would know that. But maybe they don’t want to. Like the reporting on the “Obamacare disasters” I noted in my last post (The Press, An Attitude, and Miss-Informing), they have a belief and an attitude toward the poor, and don’t look any further than anything that supports that belief. So lets clear the air:

  • Actual fraud waste and abuse has been measured at less than 1%, smaller than any other government program
  • The cuts proposed are on top of a $5 billion cut starting today as the stimulus supplement expires
  • Food stamp enrollment has exactly tracked poverty rates which have gone up since the great recession
  • 44% of SNAP benefits go to children (22 million).  So we need to get those kids into work houses and drug test them?
  • Homeless rates for US children has risen 72% and 1 in 4 live in poverty. So lets get them all drug tested? Cutting their benefits helps them off the program?
  • Expiration of SNAP funding will effect 900,000 veterans. You know those lazy shiftless scum who served our country
  •  76 percent of SNAP (food stamp) households included a child, an elderly person or a disabled person. These vulnerable households receive 83 percent of all SNAP benefits. Again lets get those elderly and disabled into work houses and drug test them. Does anybody ask what the cost of a drug testing program would be?
  • More than half of families of fast food workers receive some sort of public assistance including food stamps, costing the nation $7 billion a year, and wouldn’t it make sense to raise the minimum wage and get many people off food stamps?
  • As Dean Baker pointed out, cut to food stamps is equal to 0.14 percent of the budget this year and the Republican proposal to cut benefits by an amount equal to 0.09 percent of projected spending over the next decade.  Big fucking savings on the backs of poor people. It is the Republican way
  • Wall Street journal points out that the “change will leave 48 million Americans with an estimated $16 billion less to spend over the next 3 years and comes after the expiration of a payroll tax cut knocked 2% off consumers’ monthly paychecks.”  In other words, SNAP generated $9 in economic activity for every $5 in spending. It is stupid economic policy to cut this program
  • It make no political sense because those that need this the most are in Red States where they representatives want to do the program the most damage

So it makes no sense, is counter productive and flies in the face of reality. These Republicans live in an Ayn Rand fantasyland that does not exist and deny reality even when it hurts them.  And that is who is running our government.  Anybody who votes Republican just enables these people and helps to dismantle the well-being and strength of America. Oh, and any compromise by Democrats on this draconian measure is just another capitulation that makes the Democratic Party irrelevant as it stands for nothing.

And Yo Abby Huntsman! Still a proud Republican who just wants your Party back? This is your Party.

 

Sunday Morning Follies

Well it is Sunday Morning which is hot coffee, muffin, and the Times, Chronicle, and Sac Bee and the following struck my fancy:

  • I see where Afghan men are protesting a proposed law to outlaw child marriages and wife beating as against the Muslim religion. I saw a picture where a line of Pakistani women were voting dressed in their Burka’s with their children peering out from their ghost like mothers. Is that a great religion or what? I wonder if women who wear headscarfs get it. It screams you are a second class citizen.
  • Remind yourself of the great Republican chant that our corporate tax rate is the highest in most advanced countries. Ask yourself what they really pay with all the loopholes (effective tax rate): Amazon.com paid 6 percent; Boeing, 7 percent; Apple, 14 percent; General Electric, 16 percent; Google, 17 percent; eBay, Eli Lilly and Raytheon, 19 percent; and FedEx, 23 percent. And let’s not forget all those who pay nothing like our oil and gas companies. Of course we should lower it, but do you think the Republicans will close the loopholes?
  • Continue reading ‘Sunday Morning Follies’ »

Random Thoughts Before I Go Work in the Vineyard

Here are just a few thoughts I had running through my mind at 5 am this morning as I perused the papers and the days events:

  • In Moore we celebrate the “rebuild it” mentality as we did in New York after Sandy. I wonder why. Can’t we learn from stupid choices which are sure to repeat themselves soon enough?
  • We are going to limit our drone wars. I can’t help it. Killing and war are fairly stupid and if we believe in human rights, there should be due process. Mistakes are common. Collateral damage just isn’t acceptable. In a declared war is one thing, but we are violating everything we stand for because we think it will never apply to us
  • Apple gets celebrated for their innovative ways of tax sheltering billions of dollars and we want to send tax collectors (IRS) to jail. Tells you something about our Congress and why the country is becoming about the 1% or as Jared Bernstein said this morning in the Huffington Post, “Because they can indefinitely shield their foreign profits from U.S. taxes, meanwhile engaging in endless (legal) schemes to avoid taxes in countries where they book those earnings, the link between the profitability of American companies and the well-being of America is broken”
  • Continue reading ‘Random Thoughts Before I Go Work in the Vineyard’ »